American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation.

This Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) addresses the topic of acute fluid resuscitation during the first 48 hours following a burn injury for adults with burns ≥20% of the total body surface area (%TBSA). The listed authors formed an investigation panel and developed clinically relevant PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions. A systematic literature search returned 5978 titles related to this topic and after 3 levels of screening, 24 studies met criteria to address the PICO questions and were critically reviewed. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of human albumin solution, especially in patients with larger burns, to lower resuscitation volumes and improve urine output. We recommend initiating resuscitation based on providing 2 mL/kg/% TBSA burn in order to reduce resuscitation fluid volumes. We recommend selective monitoring of intra-abdominal and intraocular pressure during burn shock resuscitation. We make a weak recommendation for clinicians to consider the use of computer decision support software to guide fluid titration and lower resuscitation fluid volumes. We do not recommend the use of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived variables to guide burn shock resuscitation. We are unable to make any recommendations on the use of high-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), early continuous renal replacement therapy, or vasopressors as adjuncts during acute burn shock resuscitation. Mortality is an important outcome in burn shock resuscitation, but it was not formally included as a PICO outcome because the available scientific literature is missing studies of sufficient population size and quality to allow us to confidently make recommendations related to the outcome of survival at this time.

Ambient Room Temperatures in a Burn Intensive Care Unit-A Quality Improvement Project.

Introduction: Patients with major burn injuries are particularly susceptible to hypothermia. The ability to maintain and rapidly increase ambient temperatures may reduce the impact of hypothermia and the hypermetabolic response. The purpose of this study was to determine ambient patient room temperatures in a burn intensive care unit (ICU) and to evaluate our ability to adjust these temperatures. Methods: The ambient temperatures of 9 burn ICU patient rooms were recorded hourly over a 6-month period in an American Burn Association-verified burn centre. Temperatures were recorded using wall-mounted smart sensors, transmitted to a mobile smartphone application via Bluetooth, and then exported to Excel for analysis. On 2 predetermined dates, thermostats in all rooms were simultaneously set to maximum, and monitored over 3 h. This represented a sound change initiative, and replicated a medical order to increase the ambient temperature during critical stages of patient care. Results: We recorded 4394 individual hourly temperature measurements for each of the 9 rooms. The mean ambient temperature was 23.5 ± 0.3 °C (range 22.8-24). After intervention 1, ambient temperatures increased <2 °C in 7 rooms and by only 2 °C-3 °C in the other 2 rooms. The overall mean increase in temperature over 3 h across all rooms was 1.03 °C ± 1.19 °C (range -0.88 to 3.26). Following intervention 2, temperatures could be increased by ≥2 °C in only 2 rooms with an overall mean increase in temperature of only 0.76 °C ± 0.99 °C (range -0.29 to 2.43) across all rooms. Conclusions: The burn ICU rooms were relatively cool and our ability locally to adjust ambient temperatures quickly was limited. Burn centres should have regular facility assessments to assess whether ambient temperatures can be adjusted expeditiously when required.

Introduction : Les patients ayant des brûlures importantes (>20% de la surface corporelle totale) sont particulièrement exposés au risque d'hypothermie. La capacité à maintenir et à rapidement augmenter la température ambiante peut réduire la répercussion négative de l'hypothermie et de la réponse hypermétabolique. L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la température ambiante des chambres de patients dans une unité de soins intensifs (USI) pour brûlés et d'évaluer notre capacité à ajuster ces températures. Méthodes : La température ambiante de neuf chambres de patients en USI pour brûlés a été enregistrée heure par heure pendant une période de 6 mois dans un centre pour brûlés vérifié par l'ABA. Les températures ont été consignées en utilisant des capteurs intelligents montés sur les murs avec transmission par Bluetooth à une application mobile pour téléphone intelligent, puis exportées dans un tableau Excel pour analyse. À deux dates prédéterminées, les thermostats de toutes les chambres ont été simultanément réglés au maximum et contrôlés pendant 3 heures. Cela représentait une initiative de changement réfléchie, répliquant une consigne médicale d'augmentation de la température ambiante pendant les phases critiques de soins aux patients. Résultats : Nous avons enregistré 4394 relevés horaires de la température pour chacune des neuf chambres. La température ambiante moyenne était de 23,5 ± 0,3 °C (écart : 22,8 à 24). Après la première intervention, les températures ambiantes ont augmenté de moins de 2 °C dans 7 chambres et de seulement 2 °C à 3 °C dans les deux autres chambres. L'augmentation moyenne globale pendant les 3 heures dans toutes les chambres était de 1,03 °C ± 1,19 °C (écart : −0,88 à 3,26). Après la deuxième intervention, les températures ont pu être augmentées de ≥ 2 °C dans seulement deux chambres avec une augmentation globale moyenne de la température de seulement 0,76 °C ± 0,99 °C (écart : −0,29 à 2,43) pour l'ensemble des chambres. Conclusions : Les chambres de l'USI pour brûlés étaient relativement fraîches et notre capacité à ajuster rapidement les températures ambiantes était limitée. Les centres pour brûlés devraient faire l'objet d'évaluations régulières d'établissement pour déterminer si la température ambiante peut être ajustée dans des délais très brefs en cas de besoin.

Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign.

INTRODUCTION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes. METHODS: The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported. RESULTS: The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis. CONCLUSION: Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

American Burn Association Strategic Quality Summit 2022: Setting the Direction for the Future.

The American Burn Association (ABA) hosted a Burn Care Strategic Quality Summit (SQS) in an ongoing effort to advance the quality of burn care. The goals of the SQS were to discuss and describe characteristics of quality burn care, identify goals for advancing burn care, and develop a roadmap to guide future endeavors while integrating current ABA quality programs. Forty multidisciplinary members attended the two-day event. Prior to the event, they participated in a pre-meeting webinar, reviewed relevant literature, and contemplated statements regarding their vision for improving burn care. At the in-person, professionally facilitated Summit in Chicago, Illinois, in June 2022, participants discussed various elements of quality burn care and shared ideas on future initiatives to advance burn care through small and large group interactive activities. Key outcomes of the SQS included burn-related definitions of quality care, avenues for integration of current ABA quality programs, goals for advancing quality efforts in burn care, and work streams with tasks for a roadmap to guide future burn care quality-related endeavors. Work streams included roadmap development, data strategy, quality program integration, and partners and stakeholders. This paper summarizes the goals and outcomes of the SQS and describes the status of established ABA quality programs as a launching point for futurework.

Pressure in the Operating Room: A Potential Contributor to Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries.

Burn patients are at risk for hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs). An unexamined factor that may contribute to HAPI development is the effect of pressure from the operating table during surgery. The purpose of this study was to measure pressure on the buttocks and sacral area during burn surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Prospective study of consecutive adult burn patients admitted to an ABA-verified burn center who required surgery under GA between January 06, 2022 and December 08, 2022. We studied only cases that were supine, including those with both legs down (LD), one leg suspended (1LU), or both legs suspended (2LU). Interface pressures on the buttocks and sacral area were measured using a commercial sensor mat. Thousands of individual pressure measurements were integrated to show average and peak pressures over repetitive 10-minute intervals during the entire operation. Recordings were completed in 41 procedures among 28 patients (48.3 ± 16.9 years, % TBSA burn 19.2 ± 17.1, weight 80.2 ± 19.7 kg, BMI 26.7 ± 6.2). Both average pressure (Pave) and peak pressure (Ppeak) increased significantly with greater number of elevated legs (p < .001). During 2LU periods, Ppeak exceeded 100 mmHg for almost half the operative duration. Pave crept steadily upwards over time and had a positive relationship with weight, regardless of leg elevation. Prolonged moderate to high pressures are exerted on the sacral and buttock areas, especially with one or both legs suspended, during burn surgery. These novel observations suggest that pressure from the operating table could contribute to HAPI development.

Burn Resuscitation Practices in North America: Results of the Acute Burn ResUscitation Multicenter Prospective Trial (ABRUPT).

OBJECTIVES: ABRUPT was a prospective, noninterventional, observational study of resuscitation practices at 21 burn centers. The primary goal was to examine burn resuscitation with albumin or crystalloids alone, to design a future prospective randomized trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: No modern prospective study has determined whether to use colloids or crystalloids for acute burn resuscitation. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with burns ≥ 20% total body surface area (TBSA) had hourly documentation of resuscitation parameters for 48 hours. Patients received either crystalloids alone or had albumin supplemented to crystalloid based on center protocols. RESULTS: Of 379 enrollees, two-thirds (253) were resuscitated with albumin and one-third (126) were resuscitated with crystalloid alone. Albumin patients received more total fluid than Crystalloid patients (5.2 ± 2.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.7 mL/kg/% TBSA burn/24 hours), but patients in the Albumin Group were older, had larger burns, higher admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and more inhalation injury. Albumin lowered the in-to-out (I/O) ratio and was started ≤12 hours in patients with the highest initial fluid requirements, given >12 hours with intermediate requirements, and avoided in patients who responded to crystalloid alone. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin use is associated with older age, larger and deeper burns, and more severe organ dysfunction at presentation. Albumin supplementation is started when initial crystalloid rates are above expected targets and improves the I/O ratio. The fluid received in the first 24 hours was at or above the Parkland Formula estimate.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation of Critically Ill Burn Patients.

This Clinical Practice Guideline addresses early mobilization and rehabilitation (EMR) of critically ill adult burn patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We defined EMR as any systematic or protocolized intervention that could include muscle activation, active exercises in bed, active resistance exercises, active side-to-side turning, or mobilization to sitting at the bedside, standing, or walking, including mobilization using assistance with hoists or tilt tables, which was initiated within at least 14 days of injury, while the patient was still in an ICU setting. After developing relevant PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) questions, a comprehensive literature search was conducted with the help of a professional medical librarian. Available literature was reviewed and systematically evaluated. Recommendations were formulated through the consensus of a multidisciplinary committee, which included burn nurses, physicians, and rehabilitation therapists, based on the available scientific evidence. No recommendation could be formed on the use of EMR to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in the burn ICU, but we conditionally recommend the use of EMR to reduce ICU-acquired weakness in critically ill burn patients. No recommendation could be made regarding EMR's effects on the development of hospital-acquired pressure injuries or disruption or damage to the skin grafts and skin substitutes. We conditionally recommend the use of EMR to reduce delirium in critically ill burn patients in the ICU.

Burn Shock and Resuscitation: Review and State of the Science.

Burn shock and acute fluid resuscitation continue to spark intense interest and debate among burn clinicians. Following a major burn injury, fluid resuscitation of burn shock is life-saving, but paradoxically can also be a source of increased morbidity and mortality because of the unintended consequence of systemic edema formation. Considerable research over the past two decades has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms of edema formation, and to develop strategies to curb resuscitation fluids and limit edema development. Recognition of burn endotheliopathy - injury to the endothelium's glycocalyx layer- is one of the most important recent developments in our understanding of burn shock pathophysiology. Newer monitoring approaches and resuscitation endpoints, along with alternative resuscitation strategies to crystalloids alone, such as administration of albumin, or plasma, or high dose ascorbic acid, have had mixed results in limiting fluid creep. Clear demonstration of improvements in outcomes with all of these approaches remains elusive. This comprehensive review article on burn shock and acute resuscitation accompanies the American Burn Association's State of the Science meeting held in New Orleans, LA on November 2-3, 2021 and the Proceedings of that conference published in this journal.

A Systematic Review of Quality Improvement Interventions in Burn Care.

Quality improvement interventions (QIIs) are intended to improve the care of patients. Unlike most traditional clinical research, these endeavors emphasize the sustainable implementation of scientific evidence rather than the establishment of evidence. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review of QII publications in the field of burn care. A systematic review was conducted utilizing electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) of all studies relating to "quality improvement" in burn care published until March 31, 2020. Studies were excluded if no baseline data were reported, or if no intervention was applied and tested. Studies were scored using a novel 10-point evaluation system for QII. We evaluated 414 studies involving "quality improvement" in burn care. Only 82 studies contained a QII while 332 studies were categorized as traditional research. Several traditional research studies made claims to be QIIs, but few met the criteria. Of the 82 QII references, only 20 (24%) were accessible as full-text manuscripts, the remainder were published as abstracts only. The mean score was 7.95 for full-text studies (range 6-10) and 7.4 for abstract-only studies (range 5.5-9.5). Despite the importance of quality improvement (QI) in burn care, very few studies have been published that employ true QI methodology, and many QII studies never advance beyond publication as abstracts in conference proceedings. Based on this systematic review, we propose guidelines to improve the quality of QII submissions.

Orbital Compartment Syndrome Following Major Burn Resuscitation: A Case Series and Survey of Practice Patterns.

Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is a rare but devastating complication of over-resuscitation in burn patients that may lead to permanent visual loss. The purpose of this study was to 1) present a series of burn patients with OCS and 2) survey practice patterns of monitoring intra-ocular pressure (IOP) during burn resuscitation. Cases of OCS at two American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they 1) required lateral canthotomy/cantholysis for elevated IOPs or 2) developed blindness on admission unrelated to any other ocular pathology. Data were collected on demographics, burn characteristics, fluid administration, ophthalmologic findings, and complications. An eight-item electronic survey was distributed by email through the ABA to all physician members. Twelve patients with OCS were identified, with a mean age of 47.8 ± 12.4 years and TBSA of 63.7 ± 18.6%. Mean fluid resuscitation at 24 hours was 4.9 ± 1.6 ml/kg/%TBSA or 0.29 ± 0.06 liter/kg. Eight patients underwent canthotomy/cantholysis for OCS, whereas four were later found to have visual loss. A total of 83 (14%) ABA physicians responded to the survey. IOP was routinely measured by 23% of respondents during acute burn resuscitation. OCS appears to have developed despite a relatively low 24-hour ml/kg/% burn resuscitation volume, but with a relatively higher cumulative (liter/kg) fluid volume. Their survey found that monitoring of IOP during burn resuscitation is not routinely performed by the majority of providers. Taken together, the present study suggests clinical guidelines to recognize this complication of over-resuscitation.

The use of vasopressors during acute burn resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressors may be required during acute burn resuscitation to support mean arterial blood pressure, but their use is not well-described in the burn literature. The purpose of this study was to examine vasopressor use during acute fluid resuscitation. METHODS: Retrospective review of adults with burns ≥ 20% TBSA admitted to an ABA-verified regional burn center. Patients administered an infusion of a vasopressor for at least 30 min during the 1 st 48 h post-burn formed the PRESSOR group while patients who did not receive vasopressors formed the NoPRESSOR group. RESULTS: We studied 52 burned adults, 85% of which had flame burns. Vasopressors were administered during resuscitation to 31% of patients. Vasopressor infusions began at 20.9 ± 10.9 h post burn and were continued for 16.8 ± 10.8 h. PRESSOR patients (N = 16) had significantly greater total (p = 0.001) and full thickness burn size (p < 0.001), and need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.005) than NoPRESSOR patients (N = 36). PRESSOR and NoPRESSOR patients did not differ significantly in per cent predicted fluid volume received in the first 24 h (143 ± 58 Vs. 125 ± 46 respectively). PRESSOR patients compared to NoPRESSOR patients tended to have been administered 5% albumin (Alb) less often (38% Vs 47%) and high dose vitamin C (HDVC) more often during resuscitation (69% vs 17%). Multivariate regression analysis found that patient age (OR 1.189, 95% CI: 1.047, 1.351) and HDVC (OR 24.701, 95% CI: 1.558, 391.551) were independently associated with greater use of vasopressors. An inverse probability weighted propensity analysis also identified a significant association between HDVC and increased use of vasopressors (OR 6.902, 95 % CI: 2.503, 19.026), and significantly decreased vasopressor administration following Alb administration (OR 0.310, 95% CI: 0.130, 0.739). CONCLUSION: Advanced age appears to be the most important determinant of vasopressor use during resuscitation. While vasopressor requirements appear to have been increased by HDVC and decreased by Alb, this needs to be formally evaluated in a large randomized study.

Early Acute Kidney Injury Following Major Burns.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) early after a major burn has not been widely studied. Our purpose was to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for early AKI and the effect of early AKI on outcome. Retrospective cohort study of adults with burns ≥20% TBSA admitted between November 24, 2015 and July 1, 2019. "Early AKI" occurring within 7 days of injury was identified using urine output and serum creatinine Kidney Disease International Global Outcome criteria. Multivariate regression models were developed for development of early AKI, development of AKI on day 0 or 1 postburn ("very early AKI"), and for in-hospital death. Among 85 patients, 62.4% developed early AKI, of which 26% had stage 3 AKI. Renal replacement therapy was required in 64% of stage 3 patients by day 7. Patients with early AKI were significantly older [50 (40.5-61) vs 37.5 (27.2-46.8) years, P < .001], and a significantly greater proportion was intubated in the first 24 hours postburn (90.6 vs 59.4%, P = .001). Resuscitation with high-dose vitamin C (HDVC) was independently associated with more frequent early AKI. Older age was significantly associated and HDVC was closely associated with increased very early AKI. In-hospital mortality was 37.7% for patients with early AKI. Older age, larger burn size, and development of early stage 3 AKI were independently associated with increased in-hospital death. Early AKI is common and carries a poor prognosis for survival. Resuscitation involving HDVC appears to be related to a higher likelihood of early and possibly very early AKI.

Updating the Burn Center Referral Criteria: Results From the 2018 eDelphi Consensus Study.

Existing burn center referral criteria were developed several years ago, and subsequent innovations in burn care have occurred. Coupled with frequent errors in the estimation of extent of burn injury and depth by referring providers, patients are both over and under-triaged when the existing criteria are used to support patient care decisions. In the absence of compelling clinical trial data on appropriate burn patient triage, we convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to execute an iterative eDelphi consensus process to facilitate a revision. The eDelphi process panel consisted of n = 61 burn stakeholders and experts and progressed through four rounds before reaching consensus on key clinical domains. The major findings are that 1) burn center consultation is strongly recommended for all patients with deep partial-thickness or deeper burns ≥ 10% TBSA burned, for full-thickness burns ≥ 5% TBSA burned, for children and older adults with specific dressing and medical needs, and for special burn circumstances including electrical, chemical, and radiation injuries; 2) smaller burns are ideally followed in burn center outpatient settings as soon as possible after injury, preferably without delays of a week or more; 3) frostbite, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TENS, and necrotizing soft-tissue infection patients benefit from burn center treatment; and 4) telemedicine and technological solutions are of likely benefit in achieving this standard. Unlike the original criteria, the revised consensus-based guidelines create a framework promoting communication so that triage and treatment are specifically tailored to individual patient characteristics, injury severity, geography, and the capabilities of referring institutions.

A Review on the Use of Plasma During Acute Burn Resuscitation.

The problem of fluid creep has generated renewed interest in the use of colloids during acute burn resuscitation. Currently, human albumin solution is usually chosen as the resuscitation colloid. However, human plasma was a fundamental component of numerous burn resuscitation formulas historically, but it largely fell out of favor due to concerns surrounding transmission of infectious viruses. Nevertheless, plasma is an effective volume expander which has been demonstrated to reduce overall volume requirements during burn resuscitation. Furthermore, plasma may have beneficial effects on the endothelium by diminishing the microvascular leak that follows a major burn injury. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is now much safer from a disease transmission standpoint, and newer forms of solvent-detergent-treated plasma and lyophilized plasma offer potentially even greater safety and efficacy. The use of FFP and newer forms of plasma, which have not been extensively studied, should be investigated as potential adjuncts to acute burn resuscitation.

Inhalation Injury Does Not Influence the Amount of Blood Transfused to Major Burn Patients: A Secondary Analysis from the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation Study.

Patients with major burn injuries typically require numerous blood transfusions. It is not known if an inhalation injury (INHI) directly influences the need for blood transfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether INHI increases the amount of blood transfused to major burn patients. A secondary analysis from the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE) study was conducted. Patients with INHI were compared with patients without INHI. The number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions per day (RBC per day) between INHI and No INHI was analyzed with a multivariable regression. Patients with INHI (n = 78) had significantly larger burns (P = .0004), larger full-thickness burns (P = .0007), greater admission APACHE score (P < .0001), higher admission multiple organ dysfunction scores (P < .0001), and were transfused more RBC per day (P = .009) than No INHI patients (n = 267). In the multivariable regression analysis, RBC per day was significantly associated with the %TBSA burn (P < .0001), age of the patient (P = .004), the need for more than 1 day of mechanical ventilation (P < .0001), the occurrence of at least one blood stream infection (BSI; P = .044), and being assigned to the liberal transfusion arm of TRIBE (P < .001) but not the presence of INHI (P = .056). The null hypothesis that INHI exerts no influence on the amount of blood transfused could not be rejected. Larger burn size, advanced patient age, mechanical ventilation, and BSIs are important determinants of the blood transfusion rate in major burn patients.

Scar Quality of Skin Graft Borders: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Evaluation.

Prominent scars may remain around the border of a mature skin graft (SG) at the interface of the SG with normal skin. The border of a SG may be constructed by either exactly approximating (A) or slightly overlapping (O) the edge of the SG on the wound margin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether A or O affects the quality of the border scar of SGs applied to burn patients. This prospective study was a within-border design in which adult burn patients requiring SGs served as their own control. Half of each study border was fashioned using O and the immediately adjacent other half was made using A. We randomly assigned O or A to the proximal or distal halves of vertical borders and the medial and lateral halves of horizontal borders. Both halves of the study border were identically fixated with staples or sutures and were managed in the same fashion postoperatively. Blinded evaluations at 3, 6, and 12 months of O and A borders were performed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the observer component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and a global binary assessment of which half of the study border "looked better." Blinded patients also rated each half of the study border with a 10-point Likert scale. Values are reported as the mean ± SD or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. There were 34 borders studied in 15 subjects (46.7% female, age 29 [22,57], % TBSA burn 9.7 ± 5.3, and no inhalation injuries). Study borders were constructed at 7 (5,11) days postburn, had a total length of 12 (9.3,14.5) cm, and all involved split thickness SGs of thickness 13 (12,14)/1000th of an inch. Sheet grafts were applied in 27% and meshed grafts in 73%. SGs were applied immediately after excision in 75% or after allografting in 25%. Border scars matured between 3 and 12 months with reductions in total VSS from 8 (7,8) to 4 (3,6) for O borders (P < .001) and from 8 (7,9) to 4 (1,6) for A borders (P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between O and A borders in total VSS at 3 months (P = .165), 6 months (P = .602), and 12 months (P = .358) or in total OSAS at 3 months (P = .681), 6 months (P = .890), or 12 months (P = .601). At 12 months, 60% of O borders and 40% of A borders were globally rated as "better" (P = .258). There were no significant differences in the patients' subjective ratings of the O and A borders at 3 months (P = .920), 6 months (P = .960), and 12 months (P = .66). The scar quality at the border of a skin graft does not appear to be affected by the surgical technique used to construct the border at the time of grafting.